(Click here for the full post)
Let's get the ball rolling here and look at the overall purpose and vision for the new US Navy
NOFFS.
The background of NOFFS is linked to an April 2011 DOD & ACSM convening High-Intensity Training (HIT) workshop. Although details are included at
here, highpoints i'd like to point out include:
- New reference of ('crossfit, P-90X, etc) programs as Extreme Conditioning Program (vice HIT), yet no explanation as to reasoning to categorize into this description and why the term "Extreme" comes from.
- There is no discussion in the Negative Characteristics section, on the need to address the 'dangers' and/or safety concerns with experienced, trained supervisors. Instead of providing proper training to our sailors, it seems that the vision of new program (now known as NOFFS) is to create an entirely new program and shun any sailors interest/ participation in other successful programs (such as CrossFit, P90X).
- The workshop executive summary lists various considerations that 'military leaders' should focus on improving program efficacy and safety to include - gradual acclimation to ECPs (programming), individualized supplemental training for specific needs (again - programming), increased rest periods (certified coach, scaling), monitor for overtraining, and monitor markers of reduced capacity. All of these are great points, and all are successfully overseen by trained/experienced CrossFit Trainers. Yet in this executive summary, they refer to 'military leaders' to meet these objectives. What training is going to be provided to our 'leaders' so that they will not only be able to meet these expectations, but also provide feedback to the NOFFS system (and DOD) that it's working?
Lastly - I'm interested if the individuals listed at the bottom of the summary:
Michael F. Bergeron, Bradley C. Nindl, Patricia A. Deuster, Neal Baumgartner, Shawn Kane, William J. Kraemer, Lisa R. Sexauer, Walter R. Thompson, and Francis G. O’Connor were involved with development of NOFFS and what feedback/critiques they may have had in the final product.